"Michael" Biopic Slammed as "Hollow Infomercial" in First Reviews

The first wave of reviews for the Michael Jackson biopic, "Michael," has arrived following its wide theatrical debut on April 24, 2026. While the film was expected to be a definitive look at the King of Pop, many critics are now slamming the production as a "hollow infomercial" that avoids his most controversial history. Directed by Antoine Fuqua, the film stars the singer's nephew, Jaafar Jackson, who has received widespread praise for his uncanny physical and vocal transformation. However, the narrative has been criticized for being a sanitized version of events that stops abruptly before the major legal battles of the 1990s. Reviewers from major outlets have noted that the film’s close ties to the Jackson estate appear to have resulted in a heavily curated and one-sided portrayal. Instead of exploring the complexities of the global icon, the script reportedly focuses on a "greatest hits" package of musical performances and family dynamics. The Hollywood Reporter described the experience as a "warm rush of transporting pleasure" for fans of the music but noted it lacks any real substance. Other critics were far harsher, with some labeling the runtime as a mechanical recreation of famous visuals rather than a human story. Despite the critical backlash and a low 27% score on Rotten Tomatoes, the film is already proving to be a massive commercial powerhouse at the box office. Industry analysts project that the biopic will earn nearly $100 million in its opening weekend, potentially unseating current hits like "The Super Mario Galaxy Movie." Supporting performances from Colman Domingo as Joe Jackson and Nia Long as Katherine Jackson have been highlighted as standout elements of the film's first act. However, the decision to end the story in 1988 has left many viewers feeling that the most significant parts of Jackson's legacy were intentionally omitted. Director Antoine Fuqua has defended the project by stating he wanted to celebrate the humanity and artistic genius of the performer. Yet, for many critics, the refusal to engage with the darker chapters of the singer's life makes the film feel like a missed opportunity for honesty. As audiences flock to theaters this weekend, the divide between critical reception and fan enthusiasm remains a central talking point in the industry. Whether "Michael" will be remembered as a definitive biography or a polished marketing tool will likely be debated for years to come.