Alleged D.C. National Guard Shooter Was a Former Afghan Soldier Who Worked With CIA-Backed Forces

The suspect’s background raises questions about vetting and radicalization.

Here’s what we know 👇

Read this especially if you're following counterterror concerns, Afghanistan withdrawal fallout, or refugee-screening failures.

📍 What Just Happened

Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal allegedly shot two National Guard soldiers near the White House, prompting immediate law enforcement response.

He ambushed the guards, firing shots that struck one soldier in the chest and head, causing critical injuries during the attack.

Lakanwal was wounded by return fire from authorities and subsequently arrested at the scene, ending the immediate threat to public safety.

🎖️ His Military Background

• Served in Afghanistan’s army in Kandahar.

• Worked alongside U.S. Special Forces.

• Injured in service; targeted by Taliban.

• Entered U.S. through Operation Allies Welcome in 2021.

🏛️ Why He Was Granted Asylum

Rahmanullah Lakanwal had previously assisted U.S. agencies, including the CIA, providing support that influenced his eligibility for asylum in America.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed Lakanwal maintained a history working with American partner forces, validating his contributions and cooperation with U.S. operations overseas.

The Biden administration reviewed his background and approved his asylum last April, citing his prior assistance and alignment with U.S. national interests.

⚠️ Why Officials Are Alarmed

GOP lawmakers had warned early about serious vetting gaps in the Afghan resettlement program, highlighting risks to national security.

The case underscores previously flagged DHS data flaws in an Inspector General report, revealing ongoing administrative and tracking deficiencies nationwide.

It raises new concerns about how many evacuees may have military or intelligence backgrounds, prompting calls for stricter oversight and review.

🧠 The Bottom Line

A former U.S. partner soldier now stands accused of a brazen attack in Washington, transforming a humanitarian resettlement program into a heated political firestorm. Lawmakers and officials are scrutinizing vetting processes, oversight failures, and security protocols, highlighting tensions between national safety, immigration policy, and political accountability across the federal government.