DHS Watchdog Finds Biden’s Afghan Refugee Program Plagued by Data Errors and Zero Oversight


A federal report found duplicate IDs and no parole tracking in Operation Allies Welcome after an Afghan parolee shot soldiers.
Here’s what went down 👇
Read this especially if you're following immigration vetting, DHS accountability, or national-security risks tied to refugee programs.
📍 What Just Happened
DHS discovered significant data inaccuracies in Biden’s 2021 Afghan resettlement program, including errors that could compromise tracking and oversight nationwide.
Records contained misspelled names, duplicate IDs, and mismatched biographical details, highlighting severe administrative shortcomings across multiple federal agencies involved.
Agencies lacked a system to monitor parolees’ legal status, and suspected D.C. shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal entered the U.S. under this program.
🧾 What the Watchdog Found
• Inaccurate data made it hard to check criminal histories.
• Multiple agencies said monitoring parole expiration was “not my responsibility.”
• USCIS and ICE couldn’t reliably connect arrivals with their background information.
• Vulnerabilities were systemic, not isolated.
🔫 The Shooter Connection
Lakanwal entered the U.S. through the Afghan resettlement program, applied for asylum in December 2024, and was approved April 2025.
He has no known criminal history in the United States, according to federal and local law enforcement records reviewed publicly.
The case has reignited scrutiny of Biden’s accelerated Afghan intake process, raising questions about vetting and oversight procedures nationwide.
🧨 Why It Matters
Approximately 90,000 Afghans became eligible for U.S. visas under Operation Allies Welcome, creating significant administrative and logistical challenges for federal authorities nationwide.
DHS errors in record-keeping and tracking now carry national-security implications, drawing intense scrutiny after the recent attack involving an Afghan parolee.
Trump has vowed to “re-examine” every Afghan admitted under Biden’s administration, signaling potential policy changes and heightened oversight moving forward.
🧠 The Bottom Line
A program intended to assist wartime allies has become both a political and security flashpoint. The absence of basic tracking systems is raising bipartisan concern, highlighting vulnerabilities in oversight. Lawmakers from both parties are scrutinizing the program, emphasizing the urgent need for reforms to prevent future risks and ensure accountability nationwide.