Ghislaine Maxwell Invokes Fifth Amendment in House Probe of Epstein Ties


Ghislaine Maxwell formally invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a virtual deposition with the House Oversight Committee on Monday. This development marks a significant roadblock in the congressional investigation aiming to uncover the full extent of Jeffrey Epstein’s illicit network.
The disgraced socialite appeared via video link from the federal prison where she is currently serving a twenty-year sentence for sex trafficking and conspiracy. Although lawmakers had hoped to secure testimony regarding Epstein’s high-profile associates, Maxwell steadfastly refused to answer substantive questions during the proceeding.
Members of the House Oversight Committee expressed visible frustration over her refusal to cooperate with their ongoing inquiry into the financial and social structures supporting Epstein. Representative Jamie Raskin noted that while the constitutional right to remain silent is absolute, her silence hinders the public’s understanding of how such abuse went unchecked for years.
The committee is specifically focused on identifying the financial institutions and powerful individuals who may have facilitated or ignored Epstein’s predatory behavior over several decades. By invoking the Fifth Amendment, Maxwell effectively shields these potential accomplices from immediate congressional scrutiny, forcing investigators to rely on other evidence.
Maxwell’s decision to remain silent comes as her legal team continues to pursue appeals regarding her 2021 conviction in federal court. Legal experts suggest that testifying before Congress could have exposed her to further legal jeopardy or perjury charges depending on the outcome of her appellate efforts.
This deposition was viewed as a crucial opportunity to bridge gaps in the narrative concerning how Epstein managed to evade justice for so long despite numerous red flags. Without her direct testimony, the committee must now pivot to subpoenaing additional documents and interviewing peripheral figures to piece together the remaining puzzle.
The investigation remains active as lawmakers vow to continue their pursuit of accountability for the victims who suffered under the Epstein-Maxwell ring. While Maxwell’s silence presents a hurdle, committee leaders insist that the probe will proceed until the full scope of the enabling network is exposed to the American public.