Trump sparks UK outrage over NATO Afghanistan 'stayed back' claims


President Donald Trump has ignited a significant diplomatic dispute after asserting that NATO allies did not fully participate in combat operations during the war in Afghanistan. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, he claimed that European partners "stayed a little back" while American forces bore the brunt of the fighting.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer immediately condemned the remarks, labeling them as a direct insult to the memory of soldiers who served and died in the conflict. His office reminded the public that hundreds of British personnel lost their lives during the twenty-year campaign, representing the second-highest casualty count after the United States.
The President used his keynote address to criticize the defense spending and combat contributions of international partners, which has been a recurring theme of his foreign policy. He specifically argued that the arrangement was unfair to American taxpayers because the United States was supposedly doing the majority of the fighting alone.
NATO officials issued a rare public rebuke in response to the allegations, emphasizing that the alliance's commitment to the mission was a truly collective effort. A spokesperson highlighted that over one thousand non-U.S. coalition troops paid the ultimate price while standing shoulder-to-shoulder with American forces.
Military veterans and opposition politicians across the United Kingdom joined the criticism, describing the President's characterization of events as historically inaccurate and offensive. The controversy has triggered a fresh wave of tension between Washington and its closest allies regarding the future of trans-Atlantic defense cooperation.
This latest row comes at a particularly sensitive moment as European leaders attempt to navigate a complex and often strained relationship with the current administration. Diplomats fear these comments could undermine the unity of the alliance as they seek to align strategies for future international security challenges.