Governor Ron DeSantis signed House Bill 1471 into law on Monday, formally prohibiting Florida courts from enforcing or applying foreign legal codes, including Sharia law.
The legislation mandates that any foreign or religious legal provision is unenforceable if it conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or Florida law.
Governor DeSantis framed the measure as a step to protect constitutional supremacy. He stated that foreign legal frameworks are fundamentally incompatible with the American judicial system.
HB 1471 also empowers the state to designate specific groups as domestic terrorist organizations. This provision expands Florida’s internal security framework and law enforcement reach.
The bill follows legislative scrutiny regarding several Islamic schools in Florida. These institutions had previously come under review while receiving taxpayer-funded education vouchers.
Supporters of the law argue that it provides a clear legal safeguard against judicial overreach. They maintain that explicit prohibitions ensure state courts adhere to domestic statutes.
Legal experts noted that the bill reinforces the principle of local legal supremacy. This is particularly relevant in disputes where foreign contracts or religious arbitrations are cited.
However, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other advocacy groups expressed strong opposition. They argue the law is redundant and unfairly targets the Muslim community.
Opponents point out that U.S. courts are already barred from enforcing laws that violate the Bill of Rights. They contend the mention of Sharia law creates a discriminatory atmosphere.
The enactment of HB 1471 marks a shift in Florida's approach to international law. It reflects a national trend of legislative efforts to insulate state judiciaries.
President Donald Trump’s administration has supported similar measures to prioritize constitutional integrity. The White House has not yet issued a specific comment on the Florida signing.
State officials expect the new regulations to take effect immediately. Legal challenges regarding the bill's constitutionality and the terrorism designation process are anticipated by civil rights organizations.