A bitter clash inside conservative media circles is blowing up online after Laura Loomer unleashed a profanity-laced attack on Candace Owens during a podcast appearance.
In the now-viral clip, Loomer insults Owens and accuses her of being racist, while simultaneously rejecting accusations that she herself holds racist views. She also attempts to explain Owens’ positions by pointing to what she claims is personal resentment rooted in her upbringing. The remarks have drawn immediate backlash across political and media spaces.
The clip gained even more traction after being amplified by RT, which highlighted the exchange as part of broader coverage focusing on divisions within American conservative circles.
This isn’t a one-off blowup. The feud between Loomer and Owens has been simmering for months, fueled by disagreements over foreign policy, alliances within the MAGA movement, and tensions involving figures like Charlie Kirk. What started as ideological اختلاف has steadily escalated into personal attacks.
Reactions online have been intense and sharply divided.
Critics say the rhetoric crosses a clear line, pointing to the language used as inflammatory and damaging, even within the rough-and-tumble world of political commentary. Supporters of both figures, however, have rushed to defend their side, framing the clash as part of a larger fight over direction and influence inside the conservative movement.
Media analysts note that moments like this often take on a life of their own once they spread beyond their original audience. With platforms and international outlets amplifying the content, the conflict quickly shifts from an internal dispute to a global talking point.
There is also a strategic layer. When state-backed outlets spotlight domestic political infighting, it can magnify perceptions of division and instability, regardless of the underlying facts.
For now, neither side appears to be backing down.
And in today’s attention economy, that likely means this feud is far from over.