Actor Austin Abrams is opening up about the creative risks taken in the finale of the hit video game adaptation.
Hollywood blockbusters rarely take big risks with their endings, usually opting for safe setups that guarantee easy sequels. But the creators of the new Resident Evil film decided to take a different path, delivering a shocking finale that has left audiences stunned.
WHAT HAPPENED
In the new cinematic reboot of the iconic Capcom franchise, actor Austin Abrams stars as Bryan, a medical courier who unwittingly finds himself in a desperate race for survival in Raccoon City. Bryan is carrying a critical package that contains the final component needed to synthesize a cure for the zombie outbreak.
However, in a tragic twist, Bryan is infected during his journey. Although he successfully delivers the package to an Umbrella Corporation laboratory and the scientists manage to create the cure, his infection progresses too far. Before the antidote can be administered, Bryan transforms into a horrific, mutated monster. He attacks the scientists, the cure falls and is seemingly lost, and the film ends with the National Guard preparing to shoot him down.
Abrams recently spoke about this bleak conclusion, praising director Zach Cregger for taking a "risky" and "gutsy" departure from standard blockbuster tropes. "I was surprised by it, but I also loved that he would take that chance," Abrams told The Hollywood Reporter.
Key Facts:
Record-Breaking Debut: The film earned an estimated $60 million domestically in its opening weekend, marking the biggest opening in Resident Evil franchise history.
- Critical Acclaim: The movie holds a 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with critics praising its atmospheric horror and return to the franchise's gritty roots.
- Creative Team: The film was directed by Zach Cregger (Barbarian) and co-written by Cregger and Shay Hatten.
- Original Character: Instead of featuring legacy game characters like Leon S. Kennedy, the movie focuses entirely on Bryan, a new character created for this adaptation.
WHY IT MATTERS
The success of Resident Evil proves that audiences are willing to embrace original stories within established franchises. By focusing on a brand-new character and delivering a definitive, tragic ending, Cregger avoided the predictable beats of typical video game adaptations.
While some hardcore fans initially expressed skepticism over the lack of classic characters, the film's atmospheric tension and commitment to survival horror have revitalized the franchise. The massive box office haul demonstrates that creative risks can pay off, challenging the industry's reliance on safe, formulaic storytelling.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
Following the film's strong opening weekend performance, fans are already speculating on a sequel. The tragic cliffhanger leaves the fate of Raccoon City hanging in the balance, and viewers are eager to see how the story will continue.
While Cregger has previously expressed some hesitation about returning to major franchise filmmaking due to fan pressure, the movie's commercial and critical triumph makes a sequel highly likely. Sony Pictures will almost certainly look to capitalize on this momentum.
WHAT WE STILL DON'T KNOW
- Will the lost cure syringe be recovered in a potential sequel, or is the antidote gone forever?
- Will a follow-up film introduce classic Resident Evil characters like Leon S. Kennedy or Jill Valentine to deal with the mutated Bryan?
- Will Zach Cregger return to direct a sequel despite his previous comments about the stress of dealing with franchise fanbases?
SOURCE NOTE
This story draws on reporting from The Hollywood Reporter.
Transparency notes
Published: Sep 21, 2026. No major post-publication update has been logged.
Spot an error or missing context? Email hi@kindjoe.com and we will review and correct if needed.
Sources
What's your take on this story?
Vote before the outcome is known and compare your call with the crowd.
No community take has been linked to this story yet.
