A disturbing viral video is drawing national attention after a woman identified online as Rada Taher> allegedly made explicit threats against Donald Trump, members of the Trump family, Elon Musk, and even the Pentagon.
In the video circulating across multiple platforms, Taher can allegedly be heard ranting about assassinating Trump, targeting family members “one by one,” confronting Musk, and making violent comments involving missiles and the Pentagon.
The footage quickly exploded online, triggering intense backlash and renewed debate over threats directed at public figures.
Multiple social media accounts under scrutiny
Online users say Taher operates several social media accounts, including one reportedly boasting more than 30,000 followers, allowing her statements to spread rapidly across different audiences.
Critics argue the size of her following makes the situation more serious, especially given the graphic nature of the alleged threats and the potential reach of the content.
The viral spread has fueled calls for federal authorities to investigate whether the comments cross the line from online rhetoric into criminal threats.
Political figures react
The controversy escalated further after Nancy Mace publicly called for law enforcement attention toward the case.
Many social media users are now demanding involvement from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, arguing that threats against presidents, government institutions, and family members should be treated with maximum seriousness regardless of political affiliation.
Growing concern over violent online rhetoric
The incident highlights a growing issue facing law enforcement and social media platforms: how to respond when extreme rhetoric gains traction online before authorities intervene.
Federal law makes certain threats against presidents, former presidents, federal officials, and government facilities criminal offenses, especially when statements appear credible or specific enough to trigger safety concerns.
At the same time, investigators often must determine whether comments were intended as real threats, political hyperbole, or attention-seeking behavior.
What may happen next
As the video continues spreading, pressure is mounting for authorities to determine whether any formal investigation is underway.
Legal experts note that even viral videos alone can become evidence if prosecutors believe a credible threat was communicated publicly.
For now, the clips remain at the center of a rapidly escalating online firestorm involving politics, free speech debates, public safety concerns, and the growing reach of viral extremist content.